Speaker Biography

Ujitha Bandara

physiotherapist at teaching hospital Kurunegala, Sri Lanka

Title: Evalution of a new therapeutic sacroiliac joint manipulation technique for patients with sacroiliac joint dysfunction

Ujitha Bandara
Biography:

Dr. Ujitha Bandara Head of the department of neuro physiotherapy unit, Teaching Hospital Kurunegala ,Sri Lanka ,I have 21 years’ experience in neurology department and clinical demonstrator of university of Peradeniya Sri Lanka ,I am a new  researcher , I have done new research for "evaluation of new therapeutic sacroiliac joint manipulation technique for SI joint dysfunction ". I have been working as a executive committee member of Sri Lanka Society of physiotherapy sins 2016

Abstract:

Purpose

The sacroiliac joint (SIJ) can be a cause of low back pain and sciatica. The aim of this study was to assess and introduce a new physiotherapy manipulation intervention for SIJ-related back and leg pain.

Methods

As a double-blinded, randomized trial, we evaluated the short-term therapeutic efficacy of a new intervention therapy against the current traditional practice. In this study, 60 patients with SIJ-related leg and back pain were studied. Following the initial assessment of each patient with respect to their perception of pain and quality of life (QOL), the effect of the treatment was evaluated. Using the visual analogue scale (annexure 1), perception of pain was assessed before and after the 1st, 2nd and 5th day (3rdday) of treatment. The instrument used for evaluation of quality of life was SF-36 (annexure1). At the outset of the study, QOL status was determined using this instrument. After the course of treatment by the assigned treatment method, each patient was reassessed using the SF-36 at the 5th week following a lapse of 4-week treatment free period. Except for having to drop out one patient for his failure to keep to the appointment, another 59 patients were treated successfully.

The results

The results show that the effect is highly significant at α = 0.001(CI 4.3+0.7) for pain reduction and α = 0.001(CI 1447.5+24.2) for QOL improvement. Of the 59 patients, 100% (n=30) have recovered from pain with the new treatment after the 3rd visit, while the recovery rate among patients who received the traditional treatment is 6.8% (n=29) after the 3rd visit.

Conclusion

In this double-blinded intervention study, the new manual therapy technique appeared to be the choice of treatment and more beneficial to the patients with back pain due to sacroiliac dysfunction than the traditional treatment. Further study to investigate its benefits with larger population should be encouraged.